At last, some buzz is going around about how artists and composers get ripped off by so-called music submission services. Other than music publishers who get their publisher’s share of royalties once they have placed a song (and the song generates money) such submission services charge fees right before they even take action. Annual membership fees (from ‘Basic’ to ‘Platinum’), per-submission-fees (anytime an artist wants them to submit a song to a potential client) or even a combination of both – these ‘companies’ still seem to be successful using a make-believe tactic, trying to tell all those often unexperienced artists that this is how the business really works.
Now anybody in a healthy state of mind can do the math:
If a music publisher places a song and the song generates 20,000.00 in royalties, his publisher’s share of 50% / 40% (depending on type and country) will still be a lot more than the submission fee of, say, 100 bucks. So why settle for less? There are two possible answers:
1. Those submission services count on the money (submission and membership fees) they still get from the large number of ‘failures’
2. Those submission services know damn well that they won’t be able to place a song due to their lack of contacts and thus won’t be able to make any money in back end royalties
Option 3 would be a combination of both, which is probably the only truth.
Now I have personally talked to a few people who are very successful in the music business and I read Jim Peterik’s (of Survivor) statement in “Songwriting For Dummies” (real fun) and they all shared the same experience:
You don’t pay song pluggers and publishers up front. Never. Everybody gets a piece of the cake at the end and that’s how they want it. Because they know there’s far more money to make than by collecting some up front service fee.
I am not sure about how music supervisors, ad agencies and record labels see such submission services, but I’m making a plea for professional music users (and artists too) to avoid dealing with “services”, “pluggers” and “libraries” who charge their artists regardless of any success. Since such submission services need to take on (and charge for) every piece of music in order to secure their income, the greater part of quality music will probably be found in serious places.
Think about it – and act !!!
Julian Angel
www.soundsofaction.com
The Loudest Music Library
Filed under: Film music, Music licensing, Music supervision, music | Tagged: music business, music libraries, Music licensing, music publishers, royalties, services, song pluggers, submission | 1 Comment »